Canon Ef Ef S Lenses
What is the difference between Canon EF-S, EF, and 'L' lens EF?

EF lenses fit on all current Canon cameras. They red point to show where it fits within the camera body. They are the standard lens. Well, usually. The EF-S are designed for the Rebel cameras Canon EOS, which includes the 300D, 350D, 400XTi, and the 20D and 30D pro-consumer. They do not work in full-frame 5D. They have a white dot to show where to mount the camera. The 10-22mm lens ($ 600-800) is one of the best non-L series, they have done. The L series is the low light scattering and lens very serious accident. Usually have a ring red on the lens. The body of the lens is often (but not always) cream. These lenses are very professionally. They can be seen at football matches for photographers sports on the sidelines. I have a 100-400mm image stabilized lens L. Leave of $ 1,500 to be exploited. Canon L-lenses are the best there is.

Canon Ef Ef S Lenses

The Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0 L IS USM go on my Rebel XTi?

I am looking for a goal that I can use for my Canon EOS Rebel XTi. I just heard that I can use in small sensor body lenses (EF-S) Is this true? And if so what would be a good lens to take portraits of natural light? I it is very clear and strong. I am looking for a goal that I can use for my Canon EOS Rebel XTi. I heard that you can use a sensor small lenses frame (EF-S) Is this true? And if so what would be a good lens to take portraits of natural light? I want to be clear and strong. I also wanted to add the lens provided with the kit. I think it's EF-S 18-55mm. I can spend up to $ 600 on a new target. Thank you for your answers!

It was stated incorrectly. You can ride in the two-dimensional Integral (FE) and small lenses (EF-S) in a Digital Rebel body. This is the room detection complete (for example, 35 mm or high-end professional cameras) that only work with the EF glass, but not EF-S. The only thing is that our goal 70-200 will work the same way as glass 112-320mm on a 35mm camera, because your body has a 1.6 crop factor (which for the equivalent 35 mm focal length is multiplied by 1.6). As for natural light portraits, which are crystal clear and clean – you'll want a main lens (no zoom). It is generally estimated that 50 mm is a good focal length for portraits. This is probably the best thing that can happen if you can afford: http://www.amazon.com/Canon-50mm-Medium-Telephoto-Cameras/dp/ = Pd_bbs_sr_2? e ie = UTF8 & s = & qid = 1204183596 & sr = 8-2 It B00009XVCZ/ref sharpness, and the first rapid, a great job in low light (which is often a problem with natural light) If $ 300 is a bit much for you to go to the version of the same lens f/1.8: http://www.amazon.com / Canon-50mm-1-8-Camera-Lens/dp/B00007E7JU/ref pd_bbs_sr_1 =? ie = UTF8 & s = qid = 1204183596 & Electronics & Sr = 8-1 It's a bit slow, but always very clear. LEM happy shooting. – RE: Additional Information – Well, you must make your choice. EFR 70-200 above is a large telephoto lens, which costs about what you have to spend (and that's even better with digital, because it automatically becomes 1.6 times higher). You can still photos taken with the 18-50 kit lens, although the quality is not equal to 50 mm initially called … Your f / 1.4 – You want an excellent portrayal of $ 300 or $ 600 a telephoto lens …. You must decide what good is more important to you! (Or throw $ 100 more in your budget and concentrate on the first zoom and f/1.8)

Dual lens macro movie Canon ef-s 18-55mm and Canon ef-s 55-250mm