Canon Eos 50d 17 85mm Lens
What is your opinion on Canon EOS 50D?
im buying a digital SLR and I thought to get the 50D. Someone Has a? Some also come with the kit lens and it shipped in a 17-85mm or something. Is it worth doing? Arnt all zooms that face, it would be better? and nobody knows what would the Nikon equivalent? Some people are just gun, but others believe that Nikon is better … I have no idea
I am immediately preceding the then 40D 50D. My brother-brother bought the 50D and I spent some time filming 40D and 50D side by side, as I learned about our cameras and the use of SLR cameras in general. The 50D a good camera and the purchase of a value? Yes Band 6 frames per second, produces excellent images all the way up to ISO 3200 and caps large enough to cope with most of the shooting sports, even at 6 frames per second. If the 50D is available with 17-85mm Lens Kit is an excellent starting point. I recommend the EF 70-300mm F4-5.6 IS USM as a second lens. A somewhat more practical alternative would be an "all-in-one as the EF-S 18-200mm f3.5-5.6 IS lens which makes a trip good. However, the 17-85mm and 70-300 are much better built and sharper lenses in general. If you like ultra-wide angles, there are Canon EF-S 10-22mm f3.5-4.5 IS USM. The best lenses in the next line of Canon professional L series of glass Regarding prices, capacity building and the Canon 50D is just midway between the Nikon D90 and D300. Compared to the D90, the 50D has more resolution, shoots faster (6.3 fps vs 4.5 fps), and has a metal exterior and closing time is not present on the D90. However, the 50D is about $ 200 more expensive than the D90 and does not provide video capability. Compared the D300, the 50D is $ 600 cheaper, offers higher resolution, and is a few oz lighter. The D300 is an impressive 51-point autofocus system and stamps has more time to 50D. The 50D and D300 are well matched to the speed standard form, but the addition of an optional battery grip increases the speed of the D300 at 8 fps. Ignore anyone who tells you Canon or Nikon is better. I grew up shooting so … They are equal in terms technology and quality. Some people prefer the design of controls on the Nikon and Canon others prefer. At that time, I was looking the digital world, Canon offers the only means of moving towards a full-frame camera really allowed to take ultra-wide, with a first 14 mm camera. All this changed in 2007 Latest with the introduction of the Nikon D3 and D700 and Canon 1Ds camera competition 5D. All this said, if you stay with Canon. You should also look for see if he can find a 40D in stock. It will save about $ 300 over the 50D. I say this because it is my opinion, the very 5megapixels high-resolution LCD is not enough upgrade to justify the purchase of the camera more face that is identical to the 40D. 50D images look great, but there are times when the 40D still seems to produce better images. The standard rule with digital SLR camera is first to spend less on your camera as you do on the glass (lenses). At this point, the 40D is $ 900 cheaper than the D300. $ 900 can get at least two very nice goal. This is something to think about. Ultimately, you must go to a store camera and try it yourself all these cameras. You decide what characteristics are important to you. And you must understand what you like. You can not really go wrong with one of them. My final was strongly influenced by the fact that he had friends (handles pro and semi-pro) with charges that were willing to loan lenses me that could not otherwise afford.