Canon Lenses Ef 50mm
best goal in terms of picture quality and built?

just got a canon eos 450 and I was checking the internet on the review of following objectives: Canon EF 50 mm F 1.8 II Canon EF 28-105 mm f/3.5-4.5 II USM'm torn between the two lenses, no, not knowing what to buy. Also I was planning buy the handle back and forth from the same DSLR. original costs about $ 130.oo w / o batteries while the responsible third party is giving more than $ Battries 99th and two additional gifts. $'ve tried the grip 99th? Is it worth? thanks in advance

The 50mm lens is a prime number, which means shoots only one focal length. The advantage is that they can be designed specifically to perform in that focal length. More likely is that you need much sharper images than the 28-105mm. 1.8 The opening will also be very good for pictures in low light or short depth of field. The disadvantage is that only the flower has a focal length so you'll have to do a lot of walking to get the right framing. The other thing I've heard about the 50mm 1.8 is that the quality construction feels cheap. If you value clear images on the desirability of zoom (zoom and I mean the ability to change the focal length) and then go for 50 mm. Otherwise go for the 28-105mm. As for the grip I have no experience with that.