Canon Nikon Lenses
here we go another time … Nikon vs Canon (lenses)?

I'm going to upgrade from my Olympus 4 / 3 system. I feel that the camera bodies come and go, but the lenses are worth the investment. So my question is, who the manufacturer is best mid-level lenses, including older ones who will benefit from a full function of the lens current and future productions? I will probably be full frame. Yes, at half price is what I meant that I wonder what system tend to have better lenses for the money without loss of $ 1500 + for a piece of glass. Do you have a lens system to favor their former for use with its new lines DSLR? I'm thinking of how to maximize my lens options, offering strange pawn shop, etc, as well as new glass product. Good info, Ace! I tend toward the nature of the street, and business travel, have no interest in sports, "Carl, I always see blank lineups for Canon shooting sports, right? and that is outside my field, regardless.

BOTH Nikon and Canon are excellent. With the exception of a single lens few specialized in both camera lenses are identical. There really are no mid-level Canon or Nikon lenses, perhaps half price. Here are different lenses. Canon makes an incredible 5:1 macro lens (perfect for medical and scientific applications) from Canon for only 800 mm f/5.6 prime lens (PO special – about $ 12,000) Nikon makes one of the best lenses for shooting sports when connected to a Nikon D3 or D300, the 200-400 mm f / 4 zoom. Nikon makes the fisheye single lens (10.5 mm) for APS-C sensored DSLR Nikon AF All, AF-S lenses PC and manual work in both full frame and APS-C cameras only EF lenses can be used in full-frame Canon cameras (35 mm, 1D series and 5D cameras.) EF-S cameras will damage the mirrors.