Canon Digital Cameras and Lenses

Anything to do with Canon Digital Cameras and Lenses

June 11th, 2010

Tamron Lenses For Canon Review
which lens is best for my DSLR …?

reading of this "fhotoace A couple of months ago Hope, I bit and bought my Canon 40D kit. Finally back in the SLR scene. Now it looks as if I spend every day looking for that goal "great." The kit lenses or can be, but you know what I mean. I've been approaching Tamron 18-200mm and Canon 28-135mm Es " Looking for versatility, if you will. I'm an intermediate photographer with a keen eye for detail. So I'm looking for that target range I was not disappointed. I do not need, nor want to spend the $ 1000 +, that the use of pro. I am not a professional, and not meant to be! However, I want the best quality for the money. I'm so tired of reading reviews. The level of review, no matter what you're looking up and down … up and down … etc. What would be your recommendation?

Optically, these all-in-one lenses are not better than the cheap kit lens Canon 18-55mm. Mega zoom putting convenience first second attractive prices and image stabilization, image quality, AF speed, low opening, and the build quality although a distant third seventh. No nothing wrong with that – these lenses are of great value for money – I'm just checking that versatility is the only criterion for an intermediate target. If so, I would go with the 18-200mm. Everything starts at 28mm (effectively 45mm on a 40D) would limit shooting indoors and landscapes / cityscapes. It's a personal call, but you can not wait an all-in-one objective of providing comprehensive coverage * some * angle? Another option would be to invest in a quality lens for the zoom range you use most. For about $ 500 you can get a Canon 17-85mm objective. This is a clear step from 18-55mm in terms of image quality and is likely to cover 90% of its needs. It could even suffice as your only lens. Or you could spend about $ 450 in a 17-50mm Tamron. This produces almost the same picture quality and has the same constant as the f/2.8 Canon $ 1,000 17-55mm. Compared to the Canon version has a slightly slower AF speed, lower quality construction and lacks image stabilization, but hey, for less than half the price that much. You could supplement the budget with a Tamron 55-200mm or 70-300mm tele-zoom to the other 20% of their shots. This is the path I chosen. I spent a fortune on the zoom range most use and saved the rest. It is not necessarily the best way to go, what works for me. Good luck deciding!

  • admin (6380)
  • Comments are closed.